Claiming that 97% of climate scientists agree is 1 big lie and is fabricated through false statistics. The majority, 66.4%, of scientists had "no position". That figure was omitted from further analysis.... In reality, the "consensus" is therefore based on a minority (33%) User ceesaart, in the Russia's war in/against Ukraine subreddit, 24 Aug 2023
I have read many misconceptions about the 97% consensus paper. I thought it would be a good idea to actually read and discuss the positives and negatives of the paper. User Gorgulak, in the Climate Skeptics: Trying to see through the alarmism subreddit, 17 Dec 2019
It looks like the climate science community has misrepresented the "97%" consensus number: "We find that 66.4% of abstracts expressed no position on AGW", this is out of 11k abstracts. So a clear majority of climate scientists took no position when publishing. User ANON331717, in the Politics without suppression subreddit, 01 Jun 2018
It looks like the climate science community has misrepresented the "97%" consensus number: "We find that 66.4% of abstracts expressed no position on AGW", this is out of 11k abstracts. So a clear majority of climate scientists took no position when publishing. User kafkaBro, in the Donald J. Trump For President subreddit, 01 Jun 2018
97% of scientists agree that humans cause climate change? User Goldwaterite, in the /r/RightwingLGBT subreddit, 23 Feb 2018
The "97% consensus": "Among abstracts that expressed a position on Anthropogenic Global Warming , 97.1% endorsed the scientific consensus"....ACTUALLY: 66.4% of abstracts expressed NO POSITION on Anthropogenic Global Warming...ONLY 33% of abstracts endorsed Anthropogenic Global Warming User stop_the_corruption, in the Donald J. Trump For President subreddit, 06 Jun 2017
someone is telling me that methods used here are flawed. any truth to that? User th3eviltwin, in the Climate Science and Climatology subreddit, 04 May 2017
What is your opinion on the fact that the consensus around anthropogenic global warming is overwhelming? [according to this research] User NoFishLikeIan, in the Climate Skeptics: Trying to see through the alarmism subreddit, 16 May 2016
97% consensus? - Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature User nilestyle, in the Climate Skeptics: Trying to see through the alarmism subreddit, 25 May 2014
The '97% of Climate Scientists' myth. 66% of Climate Scientists express no opinion either way, 97% of those who do have an opinion believe in Climate Change. Peer reviewed study. User everpresentdanger, in the Climate Skeptics: Trying to see through the alarmism subreddit, 29 Dec 2013
Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature User PoliticBot, in the Politics without suppression subreddit, 12 Aug 2013
Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature User trailertron, in the Politics subreddit, 12 Aug 2013
Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature: "Among abstracts expressing a position on AGW, 97.1% endorsed the consensus position that humans are causing global warming." User GaiusPublius, in the Climate change: the science, energy, politics, Denial industry, etc. subreddit, 12 Jun 2013
97.1% of climate change papers endorsed the consensus position that humans are causing global warming. User pnewell, in the Information about the world's climate subreddit, 15 May 2013
97.1% of climate change papers endorsed the consensus position that humans are causing global warming. User pnewell, in the Reddit Science subreddit, 15 May 2013
97.1% of climate change papers endorsed the consensus position that humans are causing global warming. User pnewell, in the environment subreddit, 15 May 2013