↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

Review on metal extraction technologies suitable for critical metal recovery from mining and processing wastes

Overview of attention for article published in Minerals Engineering, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 799)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
Summary News Twitter Dimensions citations
Title
Review on metal extraction technologies suitable for critical metal recovery from mining and processing wastes
Published in
Minerals Engineering, May 2022
DOI 10.1016/j.mineng.2022.107537
Authors

Anne J Whitworth, James Vaughan, Gordon Southam, Antony van der Ent, Philip N Nkrumah, Xiaodong Ma, Anita Parbhakar-Fox

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 83 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 14 17%
Researcher 14 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Student > Master 10 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 21 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 17 20%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 7%
Chemistry 6 7%
Engineering 6 7%
Energy 4 5%
Other 15 18%
Unknown 29 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2022.
All research outputs
#651,315
of 23,664,651 outputs
Outputs from Minerals Engineering
#6
of 799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,771
of 443,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Minerals Engineering
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,664,651 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 799 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.